Saving the children is not likely under your watch.

Here is another record you
can tack onto your biography, and it’s just the
latest indicator of your ineptness and failure to
protect the American people.
How can this be? This high death rate of infants
seems to be in direct opposition to your pro-life
agenda. But, as we know you are not really pro-life;
you are pro-birth. If you were pro-life, you would
have asked about the sentencing of the death-row
inmates you killed in Texas. And you wouldn't have
invaded Iraq on made-to-fit arguments for doing so.
You just fight to assure pregnant girls have the
child and leave the rest to someone else to worry
about.
Your allegedly pro-life platform served you well with
conservatives and Bible-thumpers. You have done
everything you could to discourage contraception and
abortions. Many states emboldened by your stand, have
placed many hurdles in front of any woman who wants
an abortion.
You and other republican jesus freaks are responsible
for so many women, especially women without money and
opportunity, to be systematically pressured into
having babies after they become pregnant.

Consider that figure of
4.7 dead newborns per thousand. Women with
money, health care access to prenatal care and
medication has significantly improved odds of
having healthy babies. So there has to be a huge
number of poor women having babies out there to
offset the lower numbers of women with health
care having children.
You don't provide basic primary health care services,
and you prohibit their access to abortions as well.
This year you also slashed the budget for child
health care programs as well. You only asked for $323
million on maternal and child health programs, less
than the $356 million that Congress appropriated last
year.

About half, a million
U.S. babies are born prematurely each year.
African-American babies are twice as likely as
white infants, to be premature, to have a low
birth weight, and to die at birth.
Doctors are fighting back. American College of
Obstetricians and Gynecologists announced a new
campaign to increase access to the morning-after pill
after you refused to allow it to be sold over the
counter. The morning-after pill cuts the chances of
pregnancy up to 89 percent if used within 72 hours of
sexual intercourse.

A new campaign was
announced Monday by the American College of
Obstetricians and Gynecologists to increase
access to the morning-after pill after you
refused to allow it to be sold over the counter.
The morning-after pill is a high dose of regular
birth control pills. It cuts the chances of
pregnancy up to 89 percent.
After today's baby is born into a poor family, it has
such a deadly gauntlet to run.
Once an unwanted child is born, the child becomes
everyone's problem.
Steven Levitt is one of the foremost economist in the
country. He recently received the John Bates Clark
medal.

He studies many unusual
issues from an economic view using sophisticated
statistics to uncover cause and effect
relationships.
One of the issues he studied was the ever-climbing
crime rates across the country during the 80's.
Politicians and police implemented several endeavors
which included more prisons, more executions, more
policemen, more aggressive judgments, and more
enforcement of minor infractions.
Suddenly in the 90's the crime rate dropped
dramatically, and everyone from President Clinton to
Rudy Giuliani and every police chief jumped on the
bandwagon to take credit for it.

Levitt looked at all
the data from the era and came to do some very
interesting conclusions. Although the reduction
of crime was partly resulting from more prisons
and more police presence the main reason for the
sharp reduction of crime was the availability of
abortions to women.
The women who felt they couldn't care for a child
didn't have them. And studies showed unwanted
children are at high risk to become criminals. So
having abortions available to women reduced the crime
rate because children were not born to women in
impoverished environments, who didn't want them.
You are not the only one living in a bubble. Many
republicans and Democrats live in their own sheltered
world as well. Republicans are especially prone to
believing that if the country's business interests
are satisfied everything else will sort itself out
somehow.
Lets admit it, pure capitalism at its best, does not
address the needs of our country, but neither does
pure socialism. The right answer seems to be
somewhere between; a thriving business environment
with a conscious for the people they hire, their
neighbors and the people they serve.
Call me an idealist but we should invest in companies
that invest in America that support our ideals. The
government should protect and serve all people not
just those able to pay into the coffers of
politicians.
Your huge industrial military complex is more than
the root of all evil; it is the cause of our ruined
democracy.
Your blind adherence to business at the cost of
socially responsible government is akin to a criminal
act, endangering the future safety of all Americans,
because although you have emboldened the terrorists
to attack our country the real danger is from within.
When Republicans like you come into office it seems
the best investment strategy is in prisons, police
tasers and baby coffins.
From:
comments@whitehouse.gov
Date:
May 10, 2006 9:59:14 PM
CDT
To:
guzmatom@mac.com
On behalf
of President Bush, thank you for your correspondence.
We appreciate hearing your views and welcome your
suggestions.
Due to the large volume of e-mail received, the White
House is
unable to respond to every message, and therefore
this response
is an autoreply.
Thank you again for taking the time to
write.
