Maybe you can give them decoder tings.
Jun/03/2006 02:02
Mr. President,
It sounded so odd to hear you discuss the need and the importance of spies.
I think you need to explain how you intend to use these spies. Valerie Plame was a spy, and you used her to make a political point to get after her husband Ambassador Joseph Wilson.
Cheney held an emergency meeting to do a "workup" on Ambassador Joseph Wilson after he dared to prove your prewar allegation that Iraq was attempting to buy large quantities of yellow cake from Niger, was based on a forgery.
Cheney was especially incensed about being caught in a lie, so he called out the vultures to publically assassinate the character of Joseph Wilson.
So someone either Rove and or Libby decided to tell reporters, Wilson was not sent by Cheney to Niger, but instead was sent on a boon dogel by his wife, a CIA agent.
It finally took a slime ball like Robert Novak to actually write the article which exposed Valerie Plame and blew her cover as a spy.
I wish I could say she was a clerk performing menial tasks in an office, but she was no ordinary CIA employee.
She is a former NOC (Non-Official Cover), a spy with nonofficial cover with no apparent connection to the U.S. government. NOCs are among the government's most closely guarded secrets, because they often work for real or fictitious companies overseas and are out on their own. It takes a long time to train and set up a NOC. If they get caught they can't claim diplomatic immunity. Jail and or death awaits the NOC caught in un unfriendly country.
Incidentally, she was collecting information on Iran's intentions to either build or acquire nuclear weapons. How Ironic. You blow the cover of a spy knee-deep in trying to understanding what Iran was up to. I bet you could have used her two years later after Iran elected President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
You ignored the brouhaha by the press over the outing of a CIA spy as long as you could, but the story wouldn't go away so you publically vowed to cooperate with the FBI investigation; the CIA called on the incident. You vowed to get to the bottom of it. You said the leaker may never be found, oh well next subject. Attorney General John Ashcoft was in charge of the case so forget about it.
The uproar over a Bush-lover like Ashcroft in charge of the case was stoked by the CIA, the Media and Democrats in Congress until Ashcroft finally recused himself after a couple of months of pressure. Fitzgerald, an independent investigator, was finally assigned to the case.
The rest is history in the making. Libby has been indicted on multiple counts of lying to the Grand Jury and Fitzgerald may yet bag Turd Blossom.
I guess Rove can't make all the shit you create, smell like flowers, if Fitzgerald gets his way you may have to change his nickname to something like: Rim Bitch or Sally Sphincter.
So it’s with great amusement that I read the news this week during the swearing in ceremony of General V. Hayden, your new CIA director, that you "urged continued development of human intelligence, calling it essential in determining the intentions of "dangerous regimes and terrorist organizations."
That's rich.
Cheney and your other neo-con buddies set up their own intelligence unit before the Iraq War, which cherry-picked the information to justify your war, then you used the CIA as the fall guy for "bad intelligence" after no WMD's were found in Iraq.
You then put hatchet-man Porter Goss in charge of the CIA to clear out anyone and everyone that wouldn't lick your boots. God knows how many good career agents, analysts, and directors ultimately quit or retired because of your purge.
You have effectively neutered the CIA in favor of beefing up Rummy's efforts to build his version of a CIA/State Department with no congressional oversight. Does he call them "Rummy's Rangers?"
So despite the havoc you brought upon the agency; you had the balls to say the CIA's needs to recruit spies "to penetrate closed societies and secretive organizations."
For what? To use them for political fodder if they or their spouses publically disagree with you? Or are you hiring to shuffle papers for "Rummy's Rangers?"
From: comments@whitehouse.gov
Date: June 3, 2006 2:24:34 AM CDT
To: guzmatom@mac.com
On behalf of President Bush, thank you for your correspondence.
We appreciate hearing your views and welcome your suggestions.
Due to the large volume of e-mail received, the White House is
unable to respond to every message, and therefore this response
is an autoreply.
Thank you again for taking the time to write.
It sounded so odd to hear you discuss the need and the importance of spies.
I think you need to explain how you intend to use these spies. Valerie Plame was a spy, and you used her to make a political point to get after her husband Ambassador Joseph Wilson.
Cheney held an emergency meeting to do a "workup" on Ambassador Joseph Wilson after he dared to prove your prewar allegation that Iraq was attempting to buy large quantities of yellow cake from Niger, was based on a forgery.
Cheney was especially incensed about being caught in a lie, so he called out the vultures to publically assassinate the character of Joseph Wilson.
So someone either Rove and or Libby decided to tell reporters, Wilson was not sent by Cheney to Niger, but instead was sent on a boon dogel by his wife, a CIA agent.
It finally took a slime ball like Robert Novak to actually write the article which exposed Valerie Plame and blew her cover as a spy.
I wish I could say she was a clerk performing menial tasks in an office, but she was no ordinary CIA employee.
She is a former NOC (Non-Official Cover), a spy with nonofficial cover with no apparent connection to the U.S. government. NOCs are among the government's most closely guarded secrets, because they often work for real or fictitious companies overseas and are out on their own. It takes a long time to train and set up a NOC. If they get caught they can't claim diplomatic immunity. Jail and or death awaits the NOC caught in un unfriendly country.
Incidentally, she was collecting information on Iran's intentions to either build or acquire nuclear weapons. How Ironic. You blow the cover of a spy knee-deep in trying to understanding what Iran was up to. I bet you could have used her two years later after Iran elected President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
You ignored the brouhaha by the press over the outing of a CIA spy as long as you could, but the story wouldn't go away so you publically vowed to cooperate with the FBI investigation; the CIA called on the incident. You vowed to get to the bottom of it. You said the leaker may never be found, oh well next subject. Attorney General John Ashcoft was in charge of the case so forget about it.
The uproar over a Bush-lover like Ashcroft in charge of the case was stoked by the CIA, the Media and Democrats in Congress until Ashcroft finally recused himself after a couple of months of pressure. Fitzgerald, an independent investigator, was finally assigned to the case.
The rest is history in the making. Libby has been indicted on multiple counts of lying to the Grand Jury and Fitzgerald may yet bag Turd Blossom.
I guess Rove can't make all the shit you create, smell like flowers, if Fitzgerald gets his way you may have to change his nickname to something like: Rim Bitch or Sally Sphincter.
So it’s with great amusement that I read the news this week during the swearing in ceremony of General V. Hayden, your new CIA director, that you "urged continued development of human intelligence, calling it essential in determining the intentions of "dangerous regimes and terrorist organizations."
That's rich.
Cheney and your other neo-con buddies set up their own intelligence unit before the Iraq War, which cherry-picked the information to justify your war, then you used the CIA as the fall guy for "bad intelligence" after no WMD's were found in Iraq.
You then put hatchet-man Porter Goss in charge of the CIA to clear out anyone and everyone that wouldn't lick your boots. God knows how many good career agents, analysts, and directors ultimately quit or retired because of your purge.
You have effectively neutered the CIA in favor of beefing up Rummy's efforts to build his version of a CIA/State Department with no congressional oversight. Does he call them "Rummy's Rangers?"
So despite the havoc you brought upon the agency; you had the balls to say the CIA's needs to recruit spies "to penetrate closed societies and secretive organizations."
For what? To use them for political fodder if they or their spouses publically disagree with you? Or are you hiring to shuffle papers for "Rummy's Rangers?"
From: comments@whitehouse.gov
Date: June 3, 2006 2:24:34 AM CDT
To: guzmatom@mac.com
On behalf of President Bush, thank you for your correspondence.
We appreciate hearing your views and welcome your suggestions.
Due to the large volume of e-mail received, the White House is
unable to respond to every message, and therefore this response
is an autoreply.
Thank you again for taking the time to write.